TechCrunch recently picked up MacRumor’s report on Apple’s assumed possession of the domain name islate.com. MacRumor found that the whois information for the domain name lists “DNStination, Inc.”, a profile often used by corporate registrar MarkMonitor to “mask” domain ownership on behalf of their clients. The article also points out that MarkMonitor is the corporate registrar that Apple is known to work with.
What TechCrunch didn’t include is that MarkMonitor held the name on behalf of a client as far back as October 2006. Before that time, it was held by Eurobox Ltd. While we can’t confirm it, chances are the domain was acquired from Eurobox.
The TechCrunch reporter decided to do a little sleuthing and found other iSlate related domains that are registered by MarkMonitor and therefore likely linked to Apple.
So here’s a lesson for brands—no matter what “masked” Whois information a registrar sets up in the Whois profile of a domain you have purchased or registered, if yours is a corporate-only registrar, it’s too easy for the press, the public, competitors and others to guess what’s going on.
If the goal is to avoid media coverage and tipping off the masses, what’s the best way for a brand to go? Definitely use a corporate registrar like MarkMonitor for your registrations. Registering domains for big companies is their business and they know it well. However, if you have a new brand in mind and want to keep the press, competitors, and squatters off the trail, make it more anonymous – register through a consumer retail registrar like Network Solutions or GoDaddy and use their privacy service.
Maybe based on this recent article the registrars that service the domain registration needs of brand owners will offer a “super secret” anonymous registration and go outside their own registrar to make registrations. I think it would be a valuable service.
TechCrunch recently picked up MacRumor’s report on Apple’s assumed possession of the domain name islate.com. MacRumor found that the whois information for the domain name lists “DNStination, Inc.”, a profile often used by corporate registrar MarkMonitor to “mask” domain ownership on behalf of their clients. The article also points out that MarkMonitor is the corporate registrar that Apple is known to work with.
What TechCrunch didn’t include is that MarkMonitor held the name on behalf of a client as far back as October 2006. Before that time, it was held by Eurobox Ltd. While we can’t confirm it, chances are the domain was acquired from Eurobox.
The TechCrunch reporter decided to do a little sleuthing and found other iSlate related domains that are registered by MarkMonitor and therefore likely linked to Apple.
So here’s a lesson for brands—no matter what “masked” Whois information a registrar sets up in the Whois profile of a domain you have purchased or registered, if yours is a corporate-only registrar, it’s too easy for the press, the public, competitors and others to guess what’s going on.
If the goal is to avoid media coverage and tipping off the masses, what’s the best way for a brand to go? Definitely use a corporate registrar like MarkMonitor for your registrations. Registering domains for big companies is their business and they know it well. However, if you have a new brand in mind and want to keep the press, competitors, and squatters off the trail, make it more anonymous – register through a consumer retail registrar like Network Solutions or GoDaddy and use their privacy service.
Maybe based on this recent article the registrars that service the domain registration needs of brand owners will offer a “super secret” anonymous registration and go outside their own registrar to make registrations. I think it would be a valuable service.
Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.domainnamestrategy.com/trackback/120
When the Secret’s Out - 'super secret' service
Kudos for the useful analysis of what may have happened in this instance. While I can’t comment on the specifics of this case, I did want to add a few points.
In 2007/8 we saw a need in the market for a ‘super secret service’, as you call it, and made a premium service available to our customers. As you noted, reporters, domain name speculators and others find ways to discover the activities of companies that wish to obfuscate their domain name registration plans. The premium service, or as we call it “Super Masking”, has helped our customers who opt to use it avoid detection of this sort.
However, I’m not sure that I agree on your advice about using retail registrars for these purposes. Retail registrars may not be able to coordinate simultaneous registration in multiple jurisdictions discreetly enough to avoid ‘tipping the hand’ on company strategy. Also, there have been examples of registrars using registration information in ways that are incompatible with corporate objectives and that might disrupt domain registration plans. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name_front_running)
Thanks again for the analysis of this timely subject.